BlackBerry – Fidelity free zone

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

BlackBerry needs something else to prevent its users from jumping ship.

  • BlackBerry’s move to make BBM available on other platform is incredibly risky unless there is something else that will ensure that BlackBerry users stay faithful.
  • BBM is also no longer about developed markets as those users have long ditched BlackBerry and gone elsewhere.
  • This is about emerging markets and first time users of smartphones.
  • BlackBerry has a strong user base with 60m users of which 70% use it daily and for a sustained period of time but almost all of them are in emerging markets.
  • By making BBM available on other platforms it can benefit from a substantial network effect as this user base encourages first time smartphone buyers to download and use the app.
  • As long as the app remains free, I can see potential for huge take up of BBM in emerging markets.
  • That’s great but how can BlackBerry prevent users from ditching their BlackBerry device when it comes to upgrade as the biggest incentive to stay has now been removed?
  • Why would a user not leave? Rival platforms offer a better user experience, decent applications and much wider device choice.
  • BlackBerry devices by comparison are expensive, limited in their range and have a very poor application experience.
  • There are two ways that this could be achieved.
    • One. Ensure that the BBM app on the BlackBerry device works better and has better features than on other devices.
    • Two. At some point in the future when the user base is huge and hopelessly addicted, withdraw third party support and thereby force users back onto BlackBerry devices.
  • This is exactly what all of the other handset makers who are in discussions to pre-load BBM onto their devices will be concerned about.
  • Many of them have already experienced this problem in one guise or another and it will not be new to them.
  • Therefore I can see rival makers requiring a huge amount of reassurance from BlackBerry to go down this path.
  • Pre-loading is always a good thing as pre-loaded apps tend to get used far more and work a lot better than those that are downloaded after purchase.
  • Unless BlackBerry has one of these two things in mind, the risk of losing all its users and becoming a tiny fraction of its current self is very real indeed.
  • BlackBerry’s proposition remains far weaker than Nokia’s and as a result has a much lower chance of recovery.
  • Nokia is by far my favourite choice of the recovery stories.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

I think this move shows that Blackberry is internally conflicted about what business it wants to be in. Two years ago then RIM had a still thriving messaging business and a shrinking device market share. It was a good time to decide whether they were in the platform business or in the messaging business. Had they chosen to focus on messaging (and port their apps to other platforms), they had a great shot at becoming the leader in both enterprise messaging with push email and also consumer messaging (with BBM). However they chose to stick to their guns and focus on the platform. They continued to lose share on the platform and now have also lost their leadership in enterprise push email. Although BBM is still popular in emerging markets, apps like Whatsapp are quickly eroding its market share. The result: the worst of both worlds. BlackBerry is now an also-ran in both devices and messaging.

As you say, porting BBM is a very risky move. But some inside the company are probably arguing (correctly) that BBM by itself is not sufficient to keep users hostage to the platform, especially given options such as Whatsapp, iMessage, Hangouts, Skype, etc. etc. — and that it is better to hang on to users on BBM even as they move to other platforms perhaps for possible monetization later.

Over two years ago I wrote an article about this very issue:

http://franciscokattan.com/2011/03/20/is-rim-in-the-smartphone-business-or-the-messaging-business-time-to-decide/

In that article I showed (using a back of the envelope calculation) that RIM was generating as much (or more) margin from its messaging subscriptions than from device sales, and it was time to decide what business it wanted to be in: platforms or messaging. Now, two years later it’s too little too late to be playing this card.

Yes you might very well be right. Everyone I know in the handset industry is looking for the head fake to try and keep users on the hardware. I think this issue goes back even further. Back in 2001 RIM was planning on being a software company. It could not et anyone to implement its solution so it became a hardware maker in order to get the software into the hands of users. That the problem with hardware. Once on you cant get off without a 90% decline in revs…eek!.

I wrote a little piece on a far-fetched idea regarding this. What if BlackBerry uses this, coupled with later steps, to gradually build an offer by which carriers in developing countries can offer handsets from other vendors coupled with low-cost service plans, BIS style? Not sure it’s entirely feasible, but in any case I fully agree this strategy, however they plan to milk it out, applies only to emerging markets.

Here’s the piece URL: http://www.modelesis.com/?p=82

Regards,

Ramón

Good points…thanks Ramon. will take a look