Wearables – All pain, little gain.

Reply to this post

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Wearables are already a commodity despite unit growth.

  • Pebble is the latest wearables company to show signs of stress as it has decided to lay off 25% of its work force.
  • This comes hot on the heels of Apple cutting $50 (14%) off the entry price of the Apple Watch, a poor reception for Fitbit’s latest product and a slew of M&A and restructurings at the end of last year.
  • The problem is not market growth, but the fact that Apple Watch has taken the premium segment has left the majority of the rest of the market priced well below $100.
  • Top of this list is Xiaomi which prices its Mi Band Pulse at just $13 meaning that anyone who wishes to price their product at a premium has to offer a lot more than just fitness tracking.
  • This is where I think Pebble (and others) have been caught in the middle and why it has become much harder to make any real money despite the market growing nicely.
  • In 2015 the wearables market grew 171% to 78.1m units (IDC) driven mostly by Apple and Xiaomi at the two opposite ends of the market.
  • I think that the reason why there is so little differentiation remains that no one has really figured out how to make a wearable product a must have.
  • Even Apple, which has a legendary ability to come up with compelling use cases, has struggled and the main question asked by potential users is: “Why would I buy it?” rather than: “How much is it?”
  • Fitness tracking is already a commodity and one with which many users rapidly tire.
  • Health tracking is also in its infancy as the sensors are still not close to being good enough to provide safe and secure health monitoring (see here).
  • Outside of that, wearables are little more than remote controls for a smartphone providing no reason for mass market adoption.
  • I suspect that this year will see growth in unit volumes but the value of the market will be much more challenged with brutal price erosion.
  • Of all the wearable players, Apple is likely fare by far the best as it has a very strong ecosystem which is critical to ensure differentiation.
  • Even Fitbit, which currently leads this market, is likely to struggle as it does not have the scale nor the experience outside of fitness tracking to put together a user experience compelling enough to keep its gross margins where they are.
  • Hence I think that 2016 will be very difficult for wearables in general as the ravages of commoditisation bite despite unit growth.
  • Apple is the only company with exposure to this market that looks even remotely safe.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

With Tim Cook reporting that one third of Apple Watch owners have multiple bands, Apple will make more from selling new bands to owners than most wearable companies can hope for in revenue. Apple has recognised that refreshing the look of a wearable is one of the keys to keeping it worn.

quite probably…plus margins on accessories are INSANE!