Google – Google minus.

Reply to this post

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Reddit and Twitter look like more realistic targets than Facebook.

  • Google has announced a significant restructuring of Google + removing the focus on social networking and instead targeting interests (collections) and communities.
  • There is no doubt that Google + has been a huge disappointment and despite substantial investment it has failed to gain any meaningful traction.
  • Google can claim hundreds of millions of users thanks to the integrated nature of its services but when one looks at usage of Google +, there is only empty desert.
  • The restructuring of Google + is an admission that Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat and so on have won the social networking space meaning that it needs to become something different.
  • The new aim of Google + is to focus on two areas collections and communities.
    • Collections groups users’ posts around different types of interests which other users can choose to follow.
    • Communities is similar to collections except that it encourages more active discussion of the various topics and interests that the community is based around. Users belong to a community rather than follow it.
  • With this change it is clear that Google is moving out from social networking and instead focusing on the much softer target of content discovery and online discussions.
  • Hence, instead of competition with Facebook, Google is now going after Reddit, Medium, Pinterest, Tumblr, Twitter and so on.
  • These companies are not without their own problems and Reddit and Twitter at the moment look like particularly soft targets.
  • However, this means that Google’s position in Digital Life now looks substantially weaker as it is no longer competing in the very important social networking space.
  • Combine this with Google’s absence in gaming and suddenly its ecosystem looks much weaker in the long-term.
  • I do not think that this is going to cause a dent in Google’s advertising revenues today but it raises question marks about Google’s ability to grow its revenues in the long-term.
  • Currently, Google monetises the data that it collects from its Digital Life services through search but this is likely to change.
  • As monetisation mechanisms become more sophisticated, I see monetisation occurring more directly within the Digital Life services themselves.
  • This means that what the ecosystem understands about the user will be monetised more directly through maps, video, games and so on.
  • An ecosystem without the services to both understand the user and monetise the traffic, will have real problems in securing long-term growth.
  • Hence, I am concerned that Google’s weakness in both gaming and social networking will cause long-term growth problems.
  • Add this to all of the other problems that Google currently faces (see here) and I can’t see any reason to remain involved with the shares.
  • I would prefer Microsoft, Samsung or even Apple to Google.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

[…] However, it is one thing to cover the pie and quite another to monetise it as the example of Google + shows (see here). […]