India Tech – Unicorns and canaries

Indian unicorns sing like canaries.

  • India is a few months ahead of the USA when it comes to dealing with the fall-out of easy money as its once highly sought after “unicorns” are scrambling to conserve cash sending a clear sign of what is to come next in the ongoing SPAC crash.
  • 44 companies in India managed to achieve a valuation of more than $1bn last year as excess liquidity chased limited equity but now the market has turned a full 180 degrees.
  • Swiggy, a food delivery company, which raised money last year at $10.7bn is shutting some of its divisions and laying off staff stating a need to get to profitability (read positive cash flow).
  • Both Cars24 which raised at $3.3bn and Meesho which raised at $4.9bn are also cutting staff in an effort to stem the red ink.
  • Unacademy and Vedantu both in online education are also cutting hard with Vedantu admitting that cash will be hard to come by going forward.
  • The list goes on and on but it is always a story where companies have raised at ridiculous valuations, gone on an expansion spree to then be hobbled by liquidity drying up and the need to raise more money.
  • This is not a new story and I have seen this happen a number of times over the last 26 years.
  • Inflation and rising interest rates have undoubtedly hurt demand as Indians focus their spending on the essentials.
  • Furthermore, the investment mood has soured with prospective investors now demanding to see profit multiples when they invest as opposed to the revenue multiples that were commonplace last year.
  • This is the problem with raising money at a nonsensical valuation because if things go wrong, one may have great difficulty in raising any more.
  • This is why the golden rule of raising money based on a narrative and hot air is to raise enough in one go to see one through to cash flow break-even so that one does not have to come back for more.
  • Unfortunately, most of the SPAC crowd have not done this, meaning that most of them are now in dire trouble and are likely to follow the Indian companies down the same route.
  • Even the companies that have something like Lucid Motors are in trouble as this company needs to raise another $6bn or so before it will make a single $1 in cash flow.
  • Fortunately, despite falling hard, Lucid is still above its IPO price and so it will have far less difficulty in raising money than many of its peers.
  • Rivian, Faraday Future, Nikola, Embark, Wejo, Otonomo and so on are all trading more than 50% below the price at which they issued, meaning that raising equity will be difficult and very dilutive for existing shareholders.
  • This is why I expect that the agonies of the SPAC crowd are only just beginning and that as they begin to run out of money we will see them start to cut back staff just as the Indians have done.
  • This is unlikely to be enough and I suspect that it will then be followed by a round of brutal consolidation ending finally with a number of these companies being acquired by larger vehicle makers in search of good EV technology.
  • In this scenario, the acquirers are likely to pay a tiny fraction of the original IPO price to acquire these assets and so I am not thinking of hunting through the SPAC wreckage for acquisition targets.
  • Instead, I am interested in companies that have financed themselves to cash flow break-even and can therefore survive, regardless of where the market pushes their shares.
  • Ouster, which makes solid-state lidar and has real revenues is one of these which is why it is the only EV / autonomous-related company that I hold in my portfolio.
  • For the rest, the worst is far from over.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.