Qualcomm vs. Ericsson – No sweat.

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Ericsson represents very little threat to Qualcomm or MediaTek.

  • Ericsson’s handset radio chipset business is emerging from the ashes of two failed joint ventures to challenge Qualcomm and MediaTek yet again.
  • The joint venture ST Ericsson has now been dismantled and integrated into Ericsson with Robert Puskaric re-appointed to run the business.
  • Puskaric ran Ericsson Mobile Platforms (EMP) from 2006 until 2009 before moving on to run Northern Europe and Central Asia for Ericsson from October 2009 until May 2014.
  • During that time (2006-2009), EMP was a force to be reckoned with in terms of chipset radio performance thanks to the radio heritage passed down from the Ericsson basestation business.
  • However, I suspect that the opportunity for this business to make a comeback has long since passed.
  • In the early days of LTE, there was only one solution in the market and every handset maker was desperate to get its hands on a second supplier in order to drive chip costs down and reduce risks.
  • At that time ST-Ericsson was the only company, other than Qualcomm, that had a decent, stable and properly working LTE modem.
  • Consequently, ST-Ericsson had every handset maker queuing up to use it as second source for LTE.
  • Unfortunately, ST Ericsson was unable to execute when it came to implementing the excellent technology in commercial silicon.
  • The delay was so great that customers gave up waiting and single sourced Qualcomm until a viable alternative was available.
  • Fast forward to 2014 and there are number of alternatives now available and customers have more to choose from.
  • Having been let down so badly by ST Ericsson, it is likely that handset customers still have a sour taste in their mouths and it will take a huge marketing effort to convince them otherwise.
  • Every player other than Qualcomm and MediaTek is hurting badly at the moment as the market concentrates to fewer players and more companies turn to in-sourcing options.
  • Hence, Ericsson is unlikely to be able to make a dent given limited resources (see below) and its awful track record in the handset industry.
  • Furthermore, its thin modem the M7450 sampled last year putting it behind the latest offerings from Qualcomm.
  • Finally a price of $17 for a LTE thin modem chipset is not actually that cheap and I suspect that Qualcomm will be able to match this price without making a dent in its current margin expectations.
  • Hence, I suspect the end result will be a failure to gain any meaningful market share followed by the business being quietly sold off or shut down.
  • This will not make a dent in Ericsson’s financial performance as I suspect that the company is putting very little additional resources behind this venture given its very high probability of failure.
  • To me, this is Ericsson seeing if it can earn something off the resources that it has already invested rather than a bold new start.
  • Qualcomm can remain safely focused on the two biggest threats to its business: MediaTek and the in-sourcing trend by some of the larger handset makers.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

Hi
I read your comparison .It will have helped if you could have also elaborated on both the pro’s and con’s of the Technical features/capabilities of Ericsson and Qualcomm LTE modems.

Definitely agree… Bespoke research is a chargeable service…fell free to ping me for a quote if you need this carried out… I have to eat too!… Cheers