Alphabet – Goodbye blue sky

Reply to this post

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Money talks, robots walk.

  • It looks like Alphabet has put its robotics venture, Boston Dynamics, up for sale because there is no immediate path to earning a return on the money invested for Alphabet.
  • Boston Dynamics is a robotics company that specialises in robots that are autonomous as far as navigating and adjusting to their immediate environment.
  • This means that they can move around with relative ease but how these robots could generate value for Alphabet shareholders is completely unclear.
  • At the end of the day Alphabet is a data and analytics company whose objective is to categorise and understand every piece of digital information about users and to sell those insights to marketers.
  • Every other piece of hardware that Alphabet makes from thermostats to internet balloons, have the capacity to collect huge amounts of data and thereby generate value to the core business.
  • The robots of Boston Dynamics do not collect data about users.
  • Instead they replace them making a business case around data extremely difficult.
  • Consequently, it seems likely that Boston Dynamics will be more valuable to an owner with a different business model such as Amazon, DHL, UPS, Cainiao (Alibaba logistics) or even the military.
  • Consequently, I suspect that there will be plenty of interest in purchasing this company but I doubt that Alphabet will book a huge return on the sale.
  • This is an encouraging sign of greater fiscal discipline at Alphabet which I think has been lacking for many years.
  • The arrival of Ruth Porat (CFO) from Morgan Stanley has triggered improvements but there is still one big nut to crack.
  • This is the general and administrative expense which is still between 7 to 8% of sales, some 200-300bp above where it should be.
  • I think that a large tech company should be spending a maximum of 5% of sales on GNA and in 2016E, RFM forecasts that Alphabet will waste around $2bn on excessive spending.
  • This is a small improvement compared to the last 2 years but more still needs to be done.
  • With the decision to sell Boston Dynamics being based on the economics of this company rather than blue sky, I have greater hope for progress on fiscal discipline.
  • The immediate outlook for Alphabet looks good as my concerns around its ability to earn a return from Android (see here) are unlikely to impact Alphabet before 2017.
  • Hence I can see Alphabet outperforming Apple in the immediate term, although I would also be considering Microsoft and Samsung as places to look for value.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

“Hence I can see Alphabet outperforming Apple in the immediate term”

I wonder how likely that is.

It seems to me that Alphabet’s recently improved financial performance is down to better discipline. Google doesn’t seem to be making progress with basic problems that appear to be limiting its growth. Google’s best days may be behind it.

On the other hand, I think the current narrative about Apple is suspect. Imagination Technologies performance isn’t a proxy for Apple performance or an indicator of “peak iPhone”. I think their recent reports may indicate that Apple has re-booted A9 supply for an updated iPhone range to be announced tomorrow. Apple may introduce its own graphics processor with the A10 and that could make a big difference to Imagination Tech. They could have problems while the iPhone marches on into budget phone territory.

It’s disappointing that most analysts are still failing to recognise that Apple is unique as a complete platform provider, including well integrated hardware, operating systems, application software and services. Pricing the stock as if it were Dell or HP is just wrong.

Actually Google’s financial performance in H2 2015 was almost entirely driven by revenues meaning that fiscal discipline had little to do with it.

The difference between Apple and Google in the next 6 months is that Google will show YoY revenue growth while Apple will not. Thats why no one likes it. I agree with you, Its great value as long as you are comfirtable with it just chugging out cash from one Q to the next.

I am pretty cautious on the IphoneSE. 5c did very little and I cant see how this will be different.

I don’t think the iPhone 5c is the right example for today’s circumstances. Try the history go iPod models instead.