Deliveroo – Unfairly hammered?

Lack of support looks to have been the cause.

  • Deliveroo took a hammering on its first day of trade falling 26% below the issue price in what I suspect has more to do with institutional support than its valuation.
  • This is a major black eye for the London Stock Exchange and may make other companies such as Oxford Nanopore (in which I have an indirect holding through IP Group) think twice about where they intend to go public.
  • Deliveroo is a delivery company that allows restaurants to offer takeaway delivery without having to invest in the infrastructure themselves.
  • In a nutshell, it is the same as Uber Eats and DoorDash except that most of its revenue comes from the UK and Ireland.
  • Consequently, these are the peers against which it should be compared when considering financial performance and valuation.
  • In 2020 Deliveroo earned revenues of £1.2bn (US$1.7bn) representing 54% growth and lost £221m (operating profit) but critically, broke even on operating cash flow.
  • DoorDash earned $2.9bn in revenues in 2020 growing 226%, lost $436m in operating profit and also generated $252m in cash from operations.
  • However, despite a 38% decline in its share price, DoorDash is still trading on around 10x 2020 EV / Sales while Deliveroo after its 26% crash yesterday is on 4.2x 2020 EV / Sales.
  • Deliveroo’s saving grace (like DoorDash) is its cash generation.
  • Despite losing £221m in 2020, it managed to generate $7.4m in cash from operations as its chosen business model is one that has negative working capital.
  • This is an unusual situation where short-term liabilities grow faster than short term assets meaning that growth can become self-financing.
  • In Deliveroo’s case, trade payables and provisions grow much more quickly than receivables largely because it takes payment on the spot but has time to pay its creditors.
  • DoorDash is similar in that it generated $252m in cash from operations despite losing $461m in 2020 in operating profit.
  • DoorDash’s growth is expected to slow in 2021 to 28% YoY which will put it broadly in line with where I think expectations for Deliveroo are.
  • Hence, DoorDash and Deliveroo are very similar companies but DoorDash is trading at double the multiple that Deliveroo is for no other reason than it is listed in the USA.
  • While all of these companies can easily be described as overvalued, as a comparative exercise, the IPO price of Deliveroo at £3.90 does not appear to be excessive and so I don’t think it was valuation that crushed the shares on day 1.
  • I think that it is far more likely that it is the corporate governance issue that caused the problem (see here).
  • Many UK institutional investors (see here) gave this IPO a pass meaning that the book-runners had to fill the books with lower quality investors who were in the IPO to make a quick profit on the first day.
  • Hence, there were no quality long-term buyers active in the market to soak up supply and so the decline became a rout.
  • If I was going to invest in any of the delivery companies (which I am not because I think it is going to be a bloodbath of cutthroat competition), it would be this one.
  • On a fair comparison to DoorDash, Deliveroo is well below the 30% discount I would give it for poor corporate governance and so I think that this becomes less of an issue in the investment thesis.
  • However, I am negative on the sector overall because of intense competition and so I would not own any of it.
  • If you forced me, it would be this one.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.