Motorola – Method in the madness.

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Google’s commitment to Motorola has nothing to do with handsets.

  • If the wires are to be believed, Google is going to spend $500m to market the Moto X.
  • The Moto X is a new concept of mobile device where the user can decide on certain aspects of the specification and then have the device built to order.
  • The device will also be built in the US creating employment for around 2,000 people in Texas.
  • The device will also be contextually aware of what is happening around it making it function accordingly.
  • For example, it will know when it is in a car travelling at 60mph and could automatically launch Google Maps and navigation functions.
  • However, $500m in marketing is not going to make up for the fact that Motorola has very little with which to differentiate it from the Android crowd.
  • Furthermore, the gimmick of customisation and being manufactured in the US is likely to result in the device being more expensive than other devices of a similar specification.
  • Android is a brutal world where only Samsung has the scale, distribution and hardware know-how to make differentiated and profitable products.
  • Hence, I suspect that the Moto X will ship in fairly low volumes which combined with an enormous marketing budget will result in the river of red ink becoming something of a tidal wave.
  • However, I think that there is method in Google’s madness.
  • The long term threat from Samsung is very real.
  • Samsung ships over 50% of Android devices today and is rapidly becoming the de-facto standard implementation of Android as far as developers are concerned.
  • Hence, should Samsung decide to fork Android, remove the Google ecosystem and replace it with its own, the developers are likely to follow.
  • To me this is inevitable as Samsung must make the move into services if it is not to suffer margin pressure as hardware continues to commoditise. (see here)
  • Against this risk Mototola offers some defence as it gives Google’s ecosystem a route to the user when Samsung cuts it off.
  • This is the only rational reason for Google to hold onto Motorola because it has done nothing than bleed shareholders dry since the day it was acquired.
  • I estimate that advertising revenues from Android devices will be worth $4bn to Google this year and potentially meaningfully more in 2014.
  • This is a revenue stream worth fighting for, explaining Google’s seemingly irrational commitment to a business that has destroyed value for nearly 10 years.
  • That being said, in the short-term shareholders of Google are going to suffer the ignominy of a spending bonanza where they have no real hope of seeing any return.

 

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

[…] The rationale for Google to hold onto Motorola Mobility remains highly questionable with the only possible reason being as a defence against Samsung in the long term (see here). […]