Samsung – Who is the master now?

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Samsung is moving to take control of Android

  • Samsung’s latest participation in the open source community shows: a) how fragmented Android is and b) how Google could easily lose control of Android.
  • Android is offered to the open source community on the basis of the Apache licence.
  • This means that when the product is shipped, any modifications made to the source code have to be contributed back to the community.
  • This is exactly what Samsung is doing in releasing its kernel for the Galaxy S4 to the community.
  • However, Samsung did not release one kernel but three (GT-19500, GT-19505 and SGH-1337M).
  • This is in indication that even within each model, where one would expect some consistency, there is enough variation to warrant a separate release.
  • Add this to the very high level of non-Google compliant devices and the desire of every handset maker to differentiate, means to me that Android should no longer be counted as an ecosystem.
  • In fact Android is really just an OS and it is the ecosystem that goes on top of that where the difference is made. 
  • For example I forecast that there will be 873m Android devices in the hands of users by the end of 2013.
  • However only around 260m of those will be Google compliant with the remainder being forked variants such as Android or Chinese versions.
  • Hence, the Android ecosystem as Google refers to it is not 1bn users. It is more like 300m. The rest are other ecosystems.
  • Fragmentation is alive and well in Android and the developers will soon have to start choosing which version to support.
  • Samsung also ships just over 50% of all Android devices meaning that if developers ensure that their applications work on Samsung devices they have over half the market covered.
  • Adding others will mean the same amount of work for a fraction of the reward.
  • Hence I suspect that developers will begin following Samsung’s modifications to Android to maximise their addressable market.
  • In time this will mean that Samsung will be in effective control of the platform.
  • Eventually, I think Samsung will rip out all of the Google applications and hooks into its servers and replace them with its own.
  • With the developers following its modifications to the source code, this will effectively become the official master code line, wresting control of it from Google.
  • This is going to take some time to accomplish, but Samsung must do it if it wants to maintain its current level of profitability as hardware becomes more and more of a commodity.
  • Hence while Samsung and Google exist in a reasonably harmonious state at the moment, this will change as Samsung feels the need to move into its patch.
  • Please see here for more on the topic of Samsung vs. Google.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

A few counter arguments / corrections:

* The apache license does not force you to distribute your modified source code.
* The GPL does force you to publish your modifications. The Linux kernel used by Android is covered by GPL.
* The kernel is where most hardware specific parts of Android are held, so having different kernel builds for different devices is not a sign of fragmentation.
* While developers building custom ROMs may care about kernel releases, app developers do not.
* It is the Android APIs and Google Play services that matter to app developers.
* Hardware manufacturers have tried to introduce their own APIs, but to very limited success.
* All significant Android API development is managed and controlled by Google.
* For most app developers Google Play remains the only serious market foot selling apps. A Western focused large scale Chinese app store could change this, Samsung is unlikely to be able to.

Yes thats true about the Kernel..I didnt realise they were running under different lisences…thanks….I have used this as a sign of the fragmentation that is higher up. And in the networking APIs the fragmentation is awful and Google is in throery contrllling the APIs but OEMs are tweaking them. Deveopers will begin to follow Samsng’s tweaks to ensure theuir apps work on Samsung devices..Google PLay the leader for now. The only potential challenger here could be the Samsung App store but it will be a while…this is a very long term view,,,This is where Samsung wants to go…I am not implying that I think that it will get there but the journey starts here.

[…] To me this is inevitable as Samsung must make the move into services if it is not to suffer margin pressure as hardware continues to commoditise. (see here) […]

[…] This is a sign of things to come and over the next 5 years, I think that Samsung will increasingly look to edge Google out of its products leaving the eco-system opportunity available for Samsung rather than Google (see here). […]

[…] This will bring it into direct conflict with Google and is why I believe that the big battle in tech over the next 5 years will be Samsung vs. Google. (see here for more details). […]

[…] Samsung cuts off Google’s route for its apps to the mobile user, Google will still have Motorola with which to reach the […]