Research Publication – Samsung & Google – Gorilla War.

MAY 27th 2014: Radio Free Mobile deepens its flagship research product with the publication of: Samsung & Google – Gorilla War – An in depth analysis of the Google/Android ecosystem.

Google vs Smasung Cover

There is no money in Android. The value is in the ecosystems that sit on top of it. Samsung has mistakenly assumed that it can maintain its 18% handset margins by focusing on hardware. Consequently, it has been willing to cede complete control of the ecosystem to Google. This has ensured that Google will grow nicely driven by mobile advertising revenues while Samsung experiences declining earnings. RFM believes that holdings in Google should be increased, financed by holdings in Samsung.

  • Android. No one except for Samsung makes good money in Android devices. Samsung has hardware differentiation, scale and brand but commoditisation will take its toll. Without scale or an edge in components or the ecosystem, an Android handset maker can hope for 3-5% EBIT margins in the best instance.
  • Gorillas The two Gorillas in Android have been squaring off against each other for some time. Samsung’s move to customise the Android user experience and to offer its own Digital Life services in competition to Google puts Google’s revenues at risk. At the same time, Samsung has to move in this direction in order preserve handset differentiation from where a good part of its profits are derived.
  • Guerrillas. The result has been a deteriorating relationship between the two over the last year. Recently, Google has been able to take advantage of indecision and conflict within Samsung to ensure its long term goals. The agreement of 27th January 2014 was really about the ecosystem and in the clandestine war; Google has by skill or by luck won a crushing victory against Samsung.
  • Samsung. Samsung is a great company. It holds global leadership positions in handsets, memory, TVs and display panels. Handsets earn 18% EBIT margins and make up 70% of group EBIT. Ceding the ecosystem to Google and getting virtually nothing in return has all but guaranteed handset margins will decline over the next 4 years. Handset EBIT is so big that its decline will overwhelm growth elsewhere, leading to a contraction of earnings in the medium term. This is why RFM believes that there is 16% downside to the share price.
  • Google. Mobile is the engine of growth at Google which is why it had to be secured at all costs. With Samsung out of its ecosystem, Google should now grow steadily over the medium term. Even with a hefty discount applied for shortcomings in corporate governance, RFM still sees 15% upside in Google shares. 

Click here for full summary and purchase options

 

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

[…] This is a great area for Samsung but it will never offset the large decline in handset profitability that RFM sees coming in the next four years (see here). […]

[…] The hardware makers are completely shut out from this data and revenue bonanza and this includes Samsung since its agreement with Google on January 27th 2014. (see here). […]

[…] In January 2014, Samsung agreed not to compete with Google in any area of the ecosystem (see here). […]

[…] decision to not compete in the ecosystem (see here) means that it has nothing with which to compete against the Chinese other than […]

[…] This is despite a crushing victory on the part of Google when it convinced Samsung to back off from its own ecosystem in mobile phones and tablets. (see here) […]

[…] that it has ceded control of the ecosystem to Google (see here) Samsung has 4 options to preserve […]

[…] RFM’s analysis has indicated that its best chance is to work with content developers to create Samsung specific versions of their apps. (See Samsung and Google – Gorilla war, 27th May 2014). […]

[…] gave away the one chance that it had to differentiate its devices through the ecosystem (see here) which has substantially limited its […]

[…] continue to believe that this deal was a huge strategic blunder for Samsung (see here) but in LG’s case there is little to […]

[…] The fact that Samsung signed a deal giving away its ability to differentiate in the ecosystem is testament to how little of this understanding exists within current management. (see here) […]

[…] This would bring Samsung into direct competition with Google Wallet and it is unclear how this relates to the non-compete agreement that the two companies have in the mobile ecosystem. (see here). […]