Dell – Game of Chicken.

RFM AvatarSmall

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders are playing a dangerous game in trying to force a higher price.

  • Today is the day when shareholders must vote on the offer made by Michael Dell and Silverlake to acquire the company for $13.65 a share.
  • To succeed the deal must win the approval of more than 50% of all shareholders excluding the shares of Michael Dell (16%).
  • In effect, the deal must win 60% of all the remaining shares in order to pass.
  • If I count up the shareholders who have publically stated that they will vote against I come to a total of 30% meaning that the vote is likely to be very close.
  • This is a very dangerous game for investors to play and has all the classic market hallmarks: greed and fear. (see here).
  • I believe that Silverlake and Dell’s interest in the company is to realise the value of the software and services piece that is currently being polluted by the PC business.
  • To achieve this they need to sell the PC business for around $17bn and use the proceeds to pay down the debt they raised in order to buy the company.
  • The risk of this strategy is that it will not be easy to sell the PC business and there is no guarantee that they will achieve a price of $17bn especially in this environment.
  • Without a deal, Dell remains at a strategic dead end and whatever strategy is chosen to turn the company around will involve substantial risk.
  • If I assume that Dell does nothing and remains the way it is, I would value it in line with Hewlett Packard (Mean 7.3x 2013/2014 PER).
  • This gives me a valuation of around $9.1 per share some 30% below where the shares stand today.
  • If the deal fails, then the chances are that the company will continue to dither and flounder and no real strategy for recovery will be put in place.
  • I would expect the shares to return to trading in line with Hewlett Packard.
  • In this instance, Hewlett Packard makes a much better investment.
  • This is because although it too has no real strategy, it does not carry the risk of losing 30% of its value.
  • I believe that $13.65 is a fair price for investors as the alternative is to see 30% of one’s value rapidly erode as Dell returns to its fair value.
  • The upside in Dell is just 6% if the deal should pass but 30% downside if it should fail.
  • There is a reason why Dell and Sell rhymes.

RICHARD WINDSOR

Richard is founder, owner of research company, Radio Free Mobile. He has 16 years of experience working in sell side equity research. During his 11 year tenure at Nomura Securities, he focused on the equity coverage of the Global Technology sector.

Blog Comments

> “If the deal fails, then the chances are that the company will continue to dither and flounder and no real strategy for recovery will be put in place.”

Leaving aside the possible share price movements in the short term, there is no reason for Michael Dell to change his turn around strategy if Dell ends up staying public. It is not all that strange for the shareholders to demand a share of the possible returns and the risks that may come from selling the PC business and moving into servers and services, if that is indeed the plan. IBM made a similar move without going private first. Ability to stay out of quarterly analyst calls may make life easier for a CEO, but it is not crucial.

yes that’s true but he hasn’t got a turn-around strategy. His strategy at the moment is to break the company up. To really make that work he needs to go private.